Facebook Pixel

UKGC hits Videoslots with £650,000 fine

Online operator Videoslots Limited has been hit with a £650,000 fine and a mandatory independent audit for systemic Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Safer Gambling failures.

Videoslots has been fined £650,000 by the UKGC over AML and safer gambling breaches. Discover how automated limits allowed players to lose thousands.

The fine is only one part of the mandated punishment. Videoslots Limited, which runs popular sites including Videoslots.co.uk, MrVegas.com, and Megariches.com, has also been issued a formal warning and, crucially, must undergo a Mandatory Independent Third-Party Audit.

The action, which comes at a time when player safety is paramount (especially during Safer Gambling Week), serves as a sharp condemnation of the operator’s over-reliance on automated systems that were demonstrably ineffective at protecting players and preventing financial crime.

When limits didn’t limit

The core of the social responsibility failure centred on a breach of Social Responsibility Code Provision (SRCP) 3.4.1, which mandates operators to identify and interact with customers to minimise gambling harm. The investigation found that Videoslots’ monitoring systems were flawed, resulting in players being allowed to gamble well beyond their self-imposed restrictions.

What exactly happened?

The major technical flaw identified was that the monthly deposit limits were configured across a calendar month and excluded a customer’s initial deposit. This loophole meant the system failed immediately upon a player setting their limit.

The resulting lack of protection led to these severe outcomes, as detailed by the UKGC:

  • Safer gambling failure: The deposit limit system excluded a player’s initial deposit, allowing one customer to lose £5,000 in under 24 hours despite a self-imposed £3,000 monthly cap.

  • AML failure: An over-reliance on a defective algorithm meant a customer deposited over £75,000 via high-risk digital vouchers in 16 days, transferring funds to multiple bank accounts without a timely Source of Funds (SOF) check.

These examples clearly demonstrate how an over-reliance on ineffective automated tools failed to identify potential harm, leaving vulnerable players unprotected.

AML failures: The £75,000 oversight

The investigation also uncovered serious breaches of Licence Condition 12.1.1 relating to the effective implementation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) controls. These failures included poor record management, gaps in policy, and, once again, an over-reliance on an automated algorithm to manage high-risk financial activity.

ALM failureDetails of breach
High-risk depositsA customer deposited over £75,000 in 16 days using digital pre-payment vouchers—a high-risk payment type.
Source of funds (SOF)The customer’s automated risk score did not trigger a timely request for Source of Funds information, leading to unacceptable delays in due diligence.
Fund tracingProceeds were transferred to four different bank accounts, while the user was occasionally accessing the account from outside Great Britain, all without effective oversight.
Operator assumptionVideoslots often relied on the presumption that high activity was funded by “recycled winnings” without sufficient scrutiny or validation.
Slider Icon

John Pierce, UKGC Director of Enforcement, criticised the unacceptable delays and the operator’s processes. He specifically highlighted the dangers of using "open-loop payment systems," such as digital vouchers, stating

"The over-reliance on an algorithm to monitor risk meant that the customer was able to carry out a high volume of deposits and transfer the proceeds of gambling to multiple different destination accounts with insufficient and timely checks."


What this means for Videoslots and the players

For Videoslots, this penalty, alongside a previous large financial fine levied by Sweden's Spelinspektionen earlier this year for excessive gambling failures, makes it clear that a complete revamp of its compliance technology and culture is non-negotiable. The required independent audit will be the operator's test, and the UKGC will be monitoring the outcomes closely.

The players

For account holders, this decisive action offers reassurance that the regulator is actively policing systemic safety failures. While customer funds were never at risk, current players can expect to see enhanced and more robust monitoring, with a greater emphasis on proactive and timely interaction, ensuring their limits and financial risk profiles are genuinely safeguarded.

Key takeaway for all operators
  • Algorithms must be tested: The UKGC demonstrated that a system designed for safety was ineffective in practice.

  • Open-loop payment risk: The use of digital vouchers has been flagged by the Director of Enforcement, John Pierce, as a high-risk payment method requiring "robust controls."

  • Proactive duty of care: This action, especially during Safer Gambling Week, reinforces that compliance must be proactive and effective, not just procedural.

A timely reminder during Safer Gambling Week

The timing of this announcement provides an ironic backdrop to Safer Gambling Week. The UKGC’s robust enforcement action reinforces the core message: that whilst safe gambling is a personal responsibility, licensed operators have a non-negotiable duty of care.

Missy MacDonald - CasinoTopsOnline

Missy Macdonald

Editorial Executive

34 Articles
Missy Macdonald is an Editorial Executive at CasinoTopsOnline. She’s had a short but varied marketing career since graduating a couple of years ago, including writing for other internationally-recognised sites about online casinos. Missy enjoys the rapid pace that the iGaming industry moves and has quickly found her space in the sector.
Expert On:
Online Casinos
Casinos Bonuses
Gambling Guides

Fact-checked by Eoin McMahon

info tooltip

Content Team Lead